Daniel Mason
Shopping Project - Nike
Nike’s advertising campaigns, specifically the Bo Jackson “Just Do It” ad and the Michael Jordan and Mars Blackmon ad, changed not only the sneaker market but advertising culture as a whole, through the use of celebrity, comedy, and above all else, a focus on brand and consumerist culture that was unprecedented in the world of sports. Within these ads, Nike transformed the definition of “sport” as a whole. Through the “coolness” exuded by their ads, Nike made exercising and sports sexy, while, at the same time, defining themselves as the keepers of this new found appeal. They turned their mass-produced sneakers, once simply an exercise necessity, into a luxury item that came, for the price of 80$, packaged with a little “cool” and an entirely new image, in addition to a great pair of shoes (CFAR 3). For the first time, conspicuous consumption transposed high fashion and made a startling appearance in the world of sneakers. Around these products, Nike marketing executives were able to develop an entire mass culture hell-bent on chasing down whatever “it” is that makes Michael Jordan and Bo Jackson so hip. Seemingly stripped of team affiliations and sport itself, these icons appear to fans, for the first time, in the same way as pop stars and musicians. Complete with startling imagery and personality, these legends leave consumers salivating over their skill, character, and swagger, offering a little piece of their “cool” for the right price and, in regards to purchases, urging consumers to “Just Do It”.
The most overarching theme in either ad is the aspect of celebrity endorsement. The use of celebrity in advertising has been a perpetually pervasive theme in society; however, its use on this scale in sports marketing is significantly more recent. Nike was one of the pioneers in this field, using celebrity influence, along with an air of confidence and comedy, to sell its products. Michael Jordan at the time was the first name on every list of important sports celebrities and considered a “super brand” himself (Klein 13). Through
Likewise, the Bo Jackson ad retains similar humor and confidence, only inserting Bo Jackson for Michael Jordan. More so than in the first ad, the spotlight is taken off Bo Jackson’s team responsibility and accomplishments and, instead, is focused on his personality and on his Nike gear. Shown in the ad as a renaissance man of sports, Bo Jackson’s character shines through as an enviable trait, surpassed only by his athletic skill. The repetition of the phrase “nice shoes” continually brings the idea of shoes to the forefront of one’s mind, providing a direct correlation with the charismatic, athletic figure that deems the shoes worthy. Through the emphasis on the celebrity and the brand, Nike finds a formula for effectively taking sports stars off the field and using them, like pop and movie stars, as an identity and larger idea attainable through the purchase of a product.
Although athletic shoes were traditionally an item thought of as mere necessity, Nike was willing to try to change that reputation and turn their shoes into a “luxury” that people would want for status and not just need. Luxury is a term often synonymous with the opulent American society which we have studied in depth this semester. The Great Gatsby was a book brimming with consumerist culture, as exemplified in the passage where Jay Gatsby attempts to win Daisy over with his fine articles of clothing. “While we admired he brought more and the soft rich heap mounted higher—shirts with stripes and scrolls and plaids in coral and apple-green and lavender and faint orange, and monograms of Indian blue. Suddenly, with a strained sound, Daisy bent her head into the shirts and began to cry stormily. “They’re such beautiful shirts,” she sobbed, her voice muffled in the thick folds. “It makes me sad because I’ve never seen such—such beautiful shirts before (Fitzgerald Chapter 5).” Obviously the natural desire of people is to want others to be Daisy to our Gatsby, in admiration of us for one reason or another. Until the 1980’s, this type of conspicuous consumption was limited to the aristocracy and available primarily through high fashion. The cultural revolution of the 1980’s, however, brought about a significant increase in prevalence of branding on clothing. The increase in size of logos on polo shirts paved the way for Nike to create sneakers that met the definition of a “luxury” purchase. Nike culture would become a self-fulfilling prophecy “If you want to be hip, wear Nike; if you are hip, you probably wear Nike (CFAR 2)”, with Michael Jordan and Bo Jackson (among others) as the high priests of “cool”.
The thought of sneakers as a fashion statement was, in fact, a huge gamble for the advertising people at Nike (CFAR 1). Following their own “Just Do It” mantra, as displayed at the end of the Bo Jackson ad, they took a risk that society would conform to their newly coined culture. Until the late 1980’s, sneakers had served the purpose of shoes to wear while exercising or playing sports, but, because of Nike’s fitness revolution, 80% of sneakers today are never used for their originally designated activity (CFAR 1). This is a remarkable number considering that Nike’s campaign and ideas originally were met with mixed reviews by critics, one critic even going so far as to refer to “Just Do It” as an “impatient-bordering-on-contemptuous exhortation to the masses (CFAR 2).” The ads were successful, though, in getting the American people to see exercise as a sexy and cool pursuit. Because Bo Jackson and Michael Jordan appeared cool and confident in the commercials wearing their Nike shoes, the average person wanted as close to that culture as money could buy.
Nike’s next step in a cultural take-over was to create an environment in which sneakers could exist as a high-style “luxury” purchase. The creation of this subculture was in part achieved by the submersion of the consumerist American youth into a world in which Nike was pervasive in everyday society. Americans could see Nike shoes on the feet of star athletes on the field, as well as in commercials and advertisements. Nike sneakers were also on the feet of prominent music artists, particularly in the “hip-hop” movement. Finally, even pop-culture icons on television and in movies wore strategically placed Nike’s in order to boost the brand’s appeal to young
The sub-culture that developed under the calculated maneuvers of Nike developed into something significantly larger than anyone expected. It became the mass-culture phenomenon that blended corporations, athletes, and sport alike into one huge historically unrecognizable phenomenon. Nike ads moved away from having to talk up the brand and instead stressed the performance elements of Nike gear and it’s increasingly diverse base of sports celebrities. Michael Jordan appeared in later ads not as the super confident sports star of the late 1980’s, but instead as “CEO Jordan”, a humorous, yet increasingly real joke about the money involved in this mass culture enterprise. As is evident in both focus ads, Nike had successfully turned the focus on themselves and away from the team and the sports. By portraying Bo Jackson as an athlete, competing in a dozen different activities all while decked out in Nike gear, the corporation could transcend a single sport and instead place Nike at the paragon of the idea of sport itself (Klein 14). The very definition of sport had been changed as Nike attempted to swallow culture in giant gulps and erase the boundaries between the pure spirit of sports and the corporate sponsorship that followed ever closely behind (Klein 13).
While consumers worldwide are left chasing Nike’s “cool”, the corporation itself has been able to transcend sports, advertising, and even its own name. Recognizable as “the swoosh”, Nike has continued to build a battalion of celebrity athletes to further draw customers to its products. Because no one wants to be Mars Blackmon, left on the outside of an inner circle of athletic and social merit, consumers are willing to drop large sums of money for “the swoosh” itself. Although we know even Bo Jackson isn’t really looking for the Tour de France, we still recognize his greatness and are led to believe, through sparkling imagery and a larger-than-life personality, that we can be as great as the men we see wearing Nike sneakers on television. A pair of the Nike Air Jordan 1’s is for sale on eBay right now for the But It Now price of $4,999.99, proving that Nike has become a cultural icon, featuring a product obviously selling for much higher than the intrinsic value because of the value of the logo in the culture within which it is submerged (eBay). While every consumer has always envied the personality and athletic prowess of their favorite cultural and sports icons, Nike pioneered the harnessing, packaging, and marketing of “cool”, in a box with a pair of over-priced sneakers, altogether providing mass society with a commercial revolution, a pass to the “in-crowd”, and a little insight into what Mars Blackmon might never know.
Works Cited
Fitzgerald, F S. The Great Gatsby. Ebooks@Adelaide.Com, 2007. The Great Gatsby. 23 Apr. 2008
"Fresh Prince Wearing Air Jordan V Grapes." Nice Kicks. 2008. 22 Apr. 2008
Klein, Naomi. "The Brand Expands." Chapter 2: How the Logo Grabbed Center Stage. 21 Apr. 2008.
Mini Case Study- Nike's "Just Do It" Advertising Campaign. CFAR.
"NIKE AIR
Wolfe, Tom. "The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby." Chapter 6. 23 Apr. 2008.
7 comments:
I thought your paper explained both the intricacies of the advertisements and the more general context of Nike's campaign well. Nike's strategy seems to a very smart one: marketing something as common as sports as a luxurious niche within consumer culture. I liked your analysis as to why people bought into this almost obvious marketing ploy. I think Thomas Frank's "hip consumerism" would fit in very well to your identification of the "cool" factor that Nike promotes.
I think it was Jordan who said it, but it was said during the early Air Jordan era that someone will wear these shoes with a tuxedo. Sure enough a few years later, some celebrity, unknown to Jordan, wore a pair of Jordan's to a show with his tux. Basketball shoes had arrived with the help of Jordan. However, I would like to know how you think that Just Do It fits into the luxury image of Air Jordans if at all. The phrase had been used in their earlier ads to spurn people to go workout and quit making excuses, but I think that that connotation has changed with the ads and I was wondering how you felt the phrase fit in with this particular series of ads you analyzed.
I enjoyed the manner in which you brought into the blog examples such as the Air Jordan 1's that are on Ebay right now. These examples, I believe, helped support everything your paper was saying. There were interesting parallels between your paper and Sabrina's paper (both on Nike). Both of you asserted that Nike was packaging a promise right along with their product. In essence, they were saying people should come be a part of a "cool group" by purchasing Nike gear, including the shoes. I got this feeling more in this paper than in Sabrina's. A particularly interesting question was the rise of athletic shoes as normal footwear, as opposed to mere footwear relegated only to sports or exercising. Do you think that Nike was instrumental in driving sneakers into the marketplace as a luxury commodity or was Nike riding on some other general trend that was taking place at the time?
Bringing conspicuous consumption into the Nike advertisements was incredibly interesting. I had never thought about tennis shoes in that way but without a doubt that is what has happened and Nike brought us to that point. Also, you had a very interesting point about how Nike preys on the fears of consumers of being left out of the loop through the character of Mars Blackman who is trying so hard to find out why Michael Jordan is the best player. Nike did a great job of creating an image for people to purchase along with the shoes. It seems that the most successful brands sell not only their product but some back story or personality to go along with it. Bringing in the scene from The Great Gatsby with Daisy crying over Gatsby’s shirts was very effective in bringing to mind exactly how these shoes played into today’s consumerism culture.
You took a unique approach to this project in choosing to analyze old ads. I really appreciated your analysis of each commercial spot, especially the Bo Jackson commercial where you pointed out the luxury of the Nike brand to a renaissance man. Because you chose to work on such an old ad, I thought it would have been great for you to have taken a paragraph to discuss how Nike's advertising has evolved. These commercials seem to exemplify Klein's point of branding sports and celebrity, which I feel is still a prevalent aspect of their campaign today, but in a more subtle manner.
I thought your paper did a very good job analyzing the inner workings of the ad campaign that Nike was working for when then started showing Jordan in his Nikes dunking on everybody. The idea that the product taking center stage and being responsible for these almost impossible acts on screen. I also really liked your point about Nike shoes becoming as much a luxury as a workout tool. One thing i think you could have spent more time on was the slogan "Just Do It". As you said in the paper, people had mixed feelings about the slogan, and even the product idea. However, just do it has become such a cultural saying that it is almost a joke today to reference it. I also think there is something to be said about "Just Do It" and impulse buying, a curse of the modern generation. Overall, very good paper, although I think you could have used a bit more focus.
Post a Comment